Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income Tax Central­- III V/s. M/s. Urban Infrastructure Venture Capital Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
 1] The present appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2008­- 09. 2] Mr. Mohanty, the learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the appeal is filed on following question; “6.1 Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT, Mumbai, was right in ignoring the provisions of Explanation 1 to section 32(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thereby holding the Capital Expenditure incurred by the Assessee on leased premises as Revenue Expenditure?” 3] The learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the explanation 1 of Section 32(1) of the Income Tax Act, 196...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930