TDS on execution of orders by one of the constituents of JV

KCL Amrcl joint Venture Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

In the given case, memebrs of JV decided to form a JV only to secure the orders and execution of the orders was to be done by one of the constituents of the JV. JV was formed for the benefit of the individual members and a business was carried on for the benefit of the businessman. There was no sub-contract relationship existed between JV partners. Accordingly, the work executed by the AMRCL was not in sub-contract. Ground raised by revenue was dismissed.

FULL TEXT OF

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.