Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Income Tax Officer (TDS) Vs M/s Beacon Projects P Ltd (ITAT Cochin)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 754 & 755/Coch/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/08/2014
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13 & 13-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CA Sandeep Kanoi

Facts of the case-

There was a non-deduction of tax from payments made to certain customers debited in direct expenses under the head “excess payment refund” which was treated as indirect expen

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Naseem Mohd says:

    above ITAT judgement is already set aside by Kerala High court (IT APPEAL NOS. 258 & 259 OF 2014 on order dated 23-06-15) and held that additional amount Paid to purchaser on cancellation of flat is not interest under section 2(28A) hence No TDS u/s 194A.

  2. Sandesh Gundecha says:

    Sir, is any SLP filed by the assessee against this order with the High Court? Interest per se has to be a fixed rate on the principal, how can this cancellation premium partake the character of interest. In my view it should be capital receipt. Is there any judgement stating such?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031