Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kushal K Bangia Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A No. 2349/ Mum/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/01/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2007- 08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Kushal K. Bangia Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) –  In principle, though the scope of “income” in s. 2(24) is very wide, a capital receipt is not chargeable to tax as income unless there is a specific provision to that effect. As the residential flat owned by the assessee in the society’s building was a capital asset in his hands, the compensation was a capital receipt.

The department’s argument that the cash compensation was a “share in profits earned by the developer” is not acceptable because it proceeds on the fallacy that the nature of payment in the hands of the payer determines the nature in the hands of the recipient. However, as the said receipt reduced the cost of acquisition of the new flat, it had to be taken into when computing the gains from a transfer thereof in the future

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. Gautam Saha says:

    One question sir. If I inherited a flat from my father who bought it in 1960, in 2003, on his death. The building went into redevelopment in 2014 and I expect to receive my new ready flat in a short time : A. can I sell the new flat immediately ? B. Will I come under long term capital gain if I buy a new residential flat ( on the difference amount ) ?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031