Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Olympia Fitness Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Olympia Fitness Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) AO made addition of ₹36,70,229 treating undisclosed turnover as income u/s 68 based on statement recorded & impounded material from survey u/s 133A. CIT(A)/NFAC passed ex-parte order after four hearing dates, three of which involved Assessee’s adjournment requests, & no adjournment on the last date. Assessee argued before Tribunal that they sought inspection of impounded material forming basis of addition & could not effectively contest before CIT(A). Tribunal held that, considering request for inspection & overall facts,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930