Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Wipro Limited Vs. Add. CIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos.1215 to 1220/Bang/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/06/2019
Related Assessment Year : :2007-08 to 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Wipro Limited Vs. Add. CIT (ITAT Bangalore)

The issue under consideration is whether surcharge and education cess should be levied only in the cases where the non-resident vendors are residents of countries with which the DTAA allows withholding rate of more than 11.33%?

ITAT states that, this is the case of the department that in respect of royalty payment to those countries also for which DTAA prescribes withholding tax rate of 10%, surcharge and cess should be levies because no proof is brought on record by the assessee about proof of residency of those parties in those countries. In this regard, ITAT find that in Para 13 of the impugned order, it is stated by CIT (A) that the assessee has submitted the details regarding software payments, name of vendor, country of vendor and amount paid and he has also stated in the same Para that he has gone through the details carefully. He has noted in the same Para that it was claimed by the assessee before him that withholding tax rate for payment of royalty to all countries in dispute except Greece is 10% but he has held that this claim is not correct and he has noted the withholding tax rate on payment of Royalty in respect of USA, UK, Austria, and Canada is 15% and the same for Spain is 20%. This shows that learned CIT (A) has not accepted the claim of the assessee without examination and verification. Hence, if this is the contention of the revenue that the vendors of Ireland, Netherland, Singapore, Israel, France, Germany, Australia and Belgium etc. are not residents of respective countries, the revenue should have brought on record some evidence in this regard. In the absence of any evidence even in one case that the vendor of a country of 10% withholding tax rate is in fact resident of some other country having higher withholding tax rate, ITAT do not find any reason to interfere in the order of CIT (A). Hence the appeals filed by the revenue is dismissed.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

ITA Nos.1215 to 1220/Bang/2014 These are appeals arising out of the common order passed by the CIT(Appeals) on the following grounds:-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031