Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ruchita Jindal Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ruchita Jindal Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that as per first proviso to section 56(2)(vii)(b), where date of agreement fixing amount of consideration for transfer of property and ate of registration is not same, the stamp duty value on the date of allotment is to be taken. Facts- The assessment of the assessee was reopened by issuing of notice u/s 148 of the Act. A notice u/s 143(2) was issued to the assessee. During the year under consideration the assessee has purchased a property on 23.06.2014 for the consideration of Rs. 7 crores. However, the value of the said flat as per valua...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930