Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

No addition U/s. 69 if Source of Funds was referable to Monies Pooled from Customers in the Form of Advances and Sales in Business

Case Law Details

Case Name
Smt. Dyapa Rajini Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2008-2009
Advertisement Smt. Dyapa Rajini Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) The Assessing Officer made an addition u/s 69 of the Act referable to peak credit closing balance found in the Savings Bank Account. The case of the assessee on the other hand was that temporary advances were taken from the customers and the same was utilised for depositing in the bank account but it was immediately withdrawn. It is not in dispute that on account of non-compliance to the notices issued by the Assessing Officer, A.O. made best judgment assessment and at that stage of the proceedings the assessee has not come forward wit...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *