Case Law Details
Case Name : Ajay B. Ghose Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ajay B. Ghose Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Conclusion: Assessee was paid severance pay due to loss of employment and the receipt of severance pay though the nomenclature was not mentioned as ex-gratia but took the character of a capital receipt and the payment was made voluntary by the employer for loss of employment and such capital receipt was not taxable in the hands of the assessee.
Held: Assessee was working with the AREVA group from the year 2006. He had received the intimation with the addition of severance pay of Rs.74,28,585/- and mismatch of income as per Form no 26AS. In the present case, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

