Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ajay B. Ghose Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ajay B. Ghose Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Conclusion: Assessee was paid severance pay due to loss of employment and the receipt of severance pay though the nomenclature was not mentioned as ex-gratia but took the character of a capital receipt and the payment was made voluntary by the employer for loss of employment and such capital receipt was not taxable in the hands of the assessee. Held: Assessee was working with the AREVA group from the year 2006. He had received the intimation with the addition of severance pay of Rs.74,28,585/- and mismatch of income as per Form no 26AS. In the present case, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930