Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dushyantbhai Ranchhodbhai Patel Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dushyantbhai Ranchhodbhai Patel Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Third-Party Settlement Admission Can’t Bind Buyer: On-Money Addition under section 69 Deleted Ahmedabad ITAT deleted an addition of ₹23 lakh u/s 69, holding that on-money admitted by the seller before Settlement Commission cannot be presumed against the purchaser in absence of independent evidence. The Assessee had purchased a commercial office space on 10-12-2014 from M/s Dev Procon Ltd., with 50% share and recorded consideration of ₹21.55 lakh. AO reopened the assessment after four years alleging that during a search on Dev Group...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031