This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Seized jewellery within limit prescribed by Circular No. 1916 cannot be treated as undisclosed
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Bhaveshkumar Amulakhbhai Sonani Vs DCIT (ITAT Surat)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Surat
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Bhaveshkumar Amulakhbhai Sonani Vs DCIT (ITAT Surat)
ITAT Surat held that seized jewellery within the permissible limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No 1916 dated 11.05.1994 couldn’t be treated as undisclosed jewellery. Accordingly, addition u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act liable to be deleted.
Facts- During the search action conducted at the above premises of assessee and other group members, various incriminating documents and evidences were seized.
The case was selected for scrutiny, during assessment, AO noted that in conducting search action, gold jewellery of 738.69 grams having net weigh...
Author Info
