Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Bhavin Kumar Rameshkumar Jain (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-2020
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Bhavin Kumar Rameshkumar Jain (ITAT Mumbai) Section 69C Cannot Be Invoked When Source of Expenditure Is Explained: ITAT Mumbai Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Bogus 80GGC Case The Mumbai ITAT (“H” Bench – SMC) dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2019-20 and upheld deletion of an addition of ₹15,000 made under section 69C towards alleged commission paid for obtaining a bogus deduction under section 80GGC. Pursuant to a search on Rashtriya Samajwadi Party (Secular), the Investigation Wing unearthed a racket of providing accommodation entries for donations eligible under sections ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

U/s 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty Reassessment Quashed for Wrong Sanction: ITAT Bangalore Strikes Down 147 Order for Breach of Section 151 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031