No section 68 addition for trade creditors settled in succeeding year through banking channels

Madhu Solanki Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

In the present case, First of all, the outstanding balances related to the purchases made during the year under consideration and not brought forward balances. The AO did not get reply from both the trade creditors and hence he proceeded to assess the outstanding balances, while accepting the purchases made during the year & payments made during the year. The AO has made the addition u/s 68 of the Act and did not invoke provisions of sec. 41(1) of the Act. On the contrary, the assess

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.