This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 54F deduction if construction not completed but amount invested?
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Smt. Usha Vaid Vs Income-tax Officer, Dasuaya (ITAT Amritsar)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2006-07
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Amritsar
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
IN THE ITAT AMRITSAR BENCH
Smt. Usha Vaid
versus
Income-tax Officer, Dasuaya
IT Appeal No. 98 (Asr.) of 2011
[Assessment year 2006-07]
July 27, 2012
ORDER
Per Bench – This appeal of the assessee arises from the order of the CIT(A), Jalandhar, dated 28.01.2011 for the assessment year 2006-07.
2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:
“1. That on the facts & circumstances, Ld. CIT(A) has grossly erred in not admitting additional evidence in the shape of electric bills, letter towards transfer of electric connection to new residential house, and report of approved ...
