This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 54EC – ITAT explains deduction of Rs. 50 Lakh & Rs. 1 Crore
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sri Arun Kumar B M Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Arun Kumar B M Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
The Assessing Officer held that the assessee is required to invest Rs.50 lakh in REC Bonds in any financial year. The Assessing Officer also relied on the amendments made to section 54EC of the I.T.Act vide Finance Act, 2014 w.e.f. 01.04.2015.
Assessee has filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that Rs.1 crore has been invested within six months from the date of sale of the asset, which has given rise to long term capital gains. Accordingly, it was submitted that prior to the amendment to sec...



Contd.(to complete)
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/law-case-law-role-professional-ca-lawyer.html
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/law-case-law-role-professional-ca-lawyer-part-ii.html
IMPROMtu
Sec 54EC – pros- or retros – pective ?- As cautioined , TIME today, if not y’day , for Govt., / CBDT to wake up and CRUY a HALT !?
READ the Published Articles FOR A VIEW
(Pro. REvenue Role of A Professional (CA & Lawyer) (Part II)
courtesy
IMPROMtu:
sec 54EC – pros- or retros – pective ?- As cautioined , TIME today, if not y’day , for Govt., / CBDT to wake up and CRUY a HALT !?
READ the Published Articles FOR A VIEW
(Pro. REvenue Role of A Professional (CA & Lawyer) (Part II)
courtesy