This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 35(2AB) deduction- ITAT allows Revision of unverified revenue expenditure
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Company Private Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Company Private Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
PCIT has passed the impugned revision order for the reason that the AO has not properly examined the weighted deduction claimed u/s 35(2AB) of the Act vis-à-vis Form 3CL. However, the AO has reopened the assessment and has examined the above said Form 3CL, but he has restricted the examination with respect to Capital Expenditure. Thus, the claim of the assessee towards revenue expenditure remained unverified. It was submitted that the assessee has filed a rectification petition u/s 154 of the Act submittin...



