Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mudassir Rashid Ahmed Bakhla Makker & Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013–14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mudassir Rashid Ahmed Bakhla Makker & Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The issue under consideration is whether penalty u/s 271B can be avoided if non-furnishing of Tax Audit Report is due to Bonafide reasons? Brief facts are, in the course of assessment proceedings the Assessing Officer noticed that, though, the assessee is required to get his accounts audited under section 44AB of the Act and furnish the audit report electronically before the due date of return of income as per section 139(1) of the Act. However, the assessee has failed to do so. Therefore, he initiated proceeding for imposition...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930