Case Law Details
Case Name : M/s Royal Lifestyle Jewellers Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chandigarh
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
M/s Royal Lifestyle Jewellers Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Conclusion:
Penalty under section 271AAB was justified as the surrender had been made on account of discrepancy /shortage in stock which had not been accounted for by assessee and the same was therefore rightly been held to qualify as “ undisclosed income” as per the definition in section 271AAB.
Held:
During the course of search, assessee had
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.