Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Royal Lifestyle Jewellers Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
M/s Royal Lifestyle Jewellers Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Conclusion: Penalty under section 271AAB was justified as the surrender had been made on account of discrepancy /shortage in stock which had not been accounted for by assessee and the same was therefore rightly been held to qualify as “ undisclosed income” as per the definition in section 271AAB. Held: During the course of search, assessee had admitted and surrendered undisclosed income of Rs. 2,83,00,000/- in the statement recorded on oath u/s 132{4). AO initiated penalty proceedings on the said income u/s 271AAB. It was h...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031