This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Section 271(1)(c) Penalty as Assessee Fully Disclosed Relevant Details
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- PCIT Vs Chetan Kumar Tekriwal (HUF) (Calcutta High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All High Courts, Calcutta High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
PCIT Vs Chetan Kumar Tekriwal (HUF) (Calcutta High Court)
In the case of PCIT vs. Chetan Kumar Tekriwal (HUF), the Calcutta High Court reviewed an appeal filed by the revenue challenging a Tribunal order from November 30, 2023, regarding the assessment year 2015-16. The issue was whether the Assessing Officer was correct in imposing a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the Assessing Officer did not establish that the assessee’s claims were false during either the assessment or penalty proceedings. The Tribunal had earlier ruled, citing the Supreme...
Author Info
