Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kalpesh Deepak Fuldale Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kalpesh Deepak Fuldale Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Penalty Appeal Dismissed for Delay Cannot Be Thrown Out Without Merits — Section 270A Penalty Matter Remanded to CIT(A) The Pune Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for statistical purposes and set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A)/NFAC, which had dismissed the penalty appeal solely on the ground of delay of 380 days, without adjudicating the merits. The case involved levy of penalty under Section 270A for alleged under-reporting/misreporting of income. The assessee contended that the show-cause notice and penalty order did not spe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930