Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Chetan Goyal (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Chetan Goyal (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi: Assessment under Section 153C Quashed – Block Period to Be Counted from Date of Material Receipt, Not Date of Search Facts in Brief During a search on Parveen K. Jain Group on 06.01.2021, a mobile phone was seized showing an image relating to a property at 451, Functional Industrial Estate, Patparganj, Delhi allegedly indicating a cash payment of ₹9.58 crore. The AO invoked Section 153C and added ₹3.78 crore as unexplained investment u/s 69, treating the Assessee, Chetan Goyal, as linked to the transaction. CIT(A) quashed the assessment order...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930