This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 148A(b) notice is not expected to be as detailed as assessment order: HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Satluj Credit & Holdings Private Limited Vs ITO (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2019-20
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Satluj Credit & Holdings Private Limited Vs ITO (Madras High Court)
On the liability to interest on the sum of Rs.18.62 Crores, it is a timing difference, and the officer prima facie believes that the interest must be taxed in AY 2019-20 relatable to the year when the order was passed by the Apex Court on the ground of accrual. Though the petitioner would suggest that the receipt had been delayed and it only after a few years that the amounts had been received, such submission involves the appreciation of facts and are best considered by the authorities.
The argument of pe...
Author Info
