Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Auradha Seth Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Auradha Seth Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Ad-hoc Household Expense Theory Cut Down: Chandigarh ITAT Restricts Jewellery Addition to 100 Grams in Search Case Chandigarh ITAT, Bench ‘A’, in Auradha Seth Vs DCIT (ITA No.259/Chd/2025; AY 2022-23; order dated 18-12-2025), partly allowed the assessee’s appeal and substantially reduced the addition made u/s 69B r.w.s. 115BBE on account of jewellery found during search. During search u/s 132 conducted on 21-10-2021 to 23-10-2021 in the Seth Cycle Group, gold jewellery weighing 3326.2 grams was found. The AO treated 1937.2 grams as unexplained and ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031