Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Auradha Seth Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Auradha Seth Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)

Ad-hoc Household Expense Theory Cut Down: Chandigarh ITAT Restricts Jewellery Addition to 100 Grams in Search Case

Chandigarh ITAT, Bench ‘A’, in Auradha Seth Vs DCIT (ITA No.259/Chd/2025; AY 2022-23; order dated 18-12-2025), partly allowed the assessee’s appeal and substantially reduced the addition made u/s 69B r.w.s. 115BBE on account of jewellery found durin

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

80G Approval Not Deniable for Incidental Religious Activities Service Tax Demand Fails Where No Event Management Activity Exists Demonetisation Cash Deposits Partly Explained, Balance Deleted No Bank Entry or Form 26AS: Professional Fee Claim Rejected Stamp Duty Addition Deleted for Lack of Evidence of Claim View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031