Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Auradha Seth Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Auradha Seth Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Ad-hoc Household Expense Theory Cut Down: Chandigarh ITAT Restricts Jewellery Addition to 100 Grams in Search Case Chandigarh ITAT, Bench ‘A’, in Auradha Seth Vs DCIT (ITA No.259/Chd/2025; AY 2022-23; order dated 18-12-2025), partly allowed the assessee’s appeal and substantially reduced the addition made u/s 69B r.w.s. 115BBE on account of jewellery found during search. During search u/s 132 conducted on 21-10-2021 to 23-10-2021 in the Seth Cycle Group, gold jewellery weighing 3326.2 grams was found. The AO treated 1937.2 grams as unexplained and ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930