Case Law Details
Case Name : Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr. (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Delhi High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The chronology of events leading up to the passing of the orders under Section 143(3) of the Act, clearly shows that the AO was `satisfied with the claim of the assessee’ while passing the original orders. Rule 8D is triggered only in a case where the AO is not satisfied with the deduction made by the Assessee. The reasons to believe assume and are predicated on the belief that the AO should not have accepted the Petitioner’s deduction as explained and justified, albeit should have applied Rule 8D. Thus, the view and opinion formed by the AO, while passing the original assessment order...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

