Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rakesh Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Rakesh Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai Strikes Down ₹3.49 Crore Section 68 Addition—Demonetisation Cash Deposits Held as Genuine Recorded Sales; 115BBE Re-Taxation Unsustainable

The Tribunal held that the ₹3.49 crore cash deposit stands fully explained as recorded cash sales, duly supported by audited books, VAT Form-704, stock register, cash book and sales invoices. The AO rejected books without issuing show-cause, violating natural justice, and then invoked Section 68 on rejected books, which is impermissible in law. The ITAT noted that the di

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031