Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mumtaz Naseem Syed Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mumtaz Naseem Syed Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi held that when the investment in house property is done jointly, claim under section 54 of the Income Tax Act is restricted to the 50%.

Facts- The case of the assessee was selected for limited scrutiny for the reason ‘Large long term capital loss on property, sale consideration of property in ITR is less than sale consideration reported in Form No. 26QB and large deduction claimed u/s 54B, 54C, 54D, 54G, 54GA’.

A

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31