Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dulraj U. Jain Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dulraj U. Jain Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) Section 147 / Section 148– Reasons recorded do not specify, prima-facie, the quantum of tax which has escaped assessment but merely states that it would be atleast be Rs.1,00,000/-. Prima-facie, we are of the view that the reasons recorded do not indicate reasonable belief of the Assessing Officer himself to issue the impugned notice. Thus, prima-facie, the impugned notice is without jurisdiction. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT 1. Heard. Rule. 2. This petition challenges notice dated 31st March, 2017 issued under Section 14...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. CA NARENDRA SEKSARIA says:

    MANY SUCH 148 NOTICES STATING VALUE OFTRANSACTION PURCHASE /SALES/BOTH OF ALLEGED PENNY SHARE BUT NOT QUANTIFYING
    ESCAPED INCOME-BUT WAIT FOR FINAL DISPOSAL

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930