Case Law Details
Case Name : Vidhya Sikshaa Educational and Charitable Trust Vs CIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009- 10
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Assessee was represented by Shri Subbarayan. The Bench queried Shri Subbarayan as to under what capacity he was appearing on behalf of the assessee. Thereupon, he replied that he was appearing as an authorized representative. He further submitted that he was a retired Deputy Commissioner of Income tax and an authorized representative as defined under sub-section 288(1) of the Act. Quoting clause (v) of sub-section (1) of section 285, Shri Subbarayan submitted that he was a person who had passed the Accountancy Examination recognized by the Central Board of Direc
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.