Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : National Company Vs ACIT (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Case Appeal Nos. 365 and 366 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/04/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

National Company Vs ACIT ( (Madras High Court)

Conclusion: Section 45(4) would not be attracted on the retirement of the two partners and consequential allotment of their share in the assets in the assessee-firm as there was no element of transfer of interest in the partnership assets by the retiring partner to the continuing partners.

Held: Assessee-company was converted into a partnership firm. At the time of retirement of two partners and admission of a new partner during the relevant year valuation of assets and liabilities of firm took place. It was held there was only a reconstitution of the partnership firm by retirement of two partners and admission of another partner. The partnership firm continued. It must also be noted that the assets of the firm originally belonged to the father of the retiring / continuing partners and there was only a division of the assets on retirement in accordance with their entitlement on the shares in the partnership. Assessee company was originally a sole proprietorship concern started by Mudaliar. It was in the business of construction and assets had been acquired even at that particular point of time. The two daughters and two sons-in-laws of Mudaliar were subsequently admitted as partners and on division of the assets, one daughter and one son-in-law were allotted a share which they were otherwise legally entitled to out of the holdings  Mudaliar. There was no element of transfer of interest in the partnership assets by the retiring partner to the continuing partners. Thus, the provisions of Section 45(4) would not be attracted on the retirement of the two partners and consequential allotment of their share in the assets in the assessee Firm.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT 

The Assessee has filed T.C.A.No. 365 of 2009 under Section 260-A of the Act challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 12.12.2008 whereby the Tribunal had allowed the Appeal of the Revenue which had been filed challenging the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – VI, Chennai, dated 16.03.2007 relevant to the Assessment Year 2004-2005.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031