Follow Us:

Introduction

Recently, a large number of taxpayers have once again started receiving notices from the Income-tax Department seeking clarification regarding deductions and exemptions claimed in their returns. This ongoing verification initiative, termed as “Seek Clarification,” is essentially a pre-emptive measure aimed at minimizing future litigation.

The Department is conscious of the fact that once a return is processed, any further inquiry can generally be undertaken only through scrutiny assessment or reassessment proceedings. To avoid resorting to such time-consuming and resource-intensive processes, it is proactively identifying cases—prior to processing—where deductions or exemptions may have been incorrectly claimed.

This also explains the consistent push towards the new tax regime, with increasing incentives being offered each year. The broader objective appears to be simplifying the tax framework, encouraging voluntary compliance, and reducing disputes and litigation over time.

However, the challenge arises for genuine taxpayers. While the principle is that a person is innocent until proven guilty, the practical experience often feels otherwise. From the Department’s perspective, the onus lies on the taxpayer to substantiate their claims. Consequently, even honest taxpayers, who have correctly claimed deductions or exemptions—often fully supported by documents such as Form 16—are required to demonstrate and justify their claims.

In the current compliance environment, the Income-tax Department has significantly enhanced its data analytics and automated return processing systems. As a result, many taxpayers are receiving communications stating that processing of return is pending due to certain discrepancies, followed by a request to submit a response through the e-filing portal.

From the notice reviewed, it is evident that such communications are in the nature of ‘Seek for Clarification’, where the taxpayer is required to furnish additional details or explanations in relation to the return filed. The response is generally required to be submitted within 30 days from the date of communication.

These notices are not assessments but are preliminary verification steps before processing the return under the automated system.

Why is it Important to Respond to the Notice?

Responding to such notices is critical for the following reasons:

  • Processing of Return is kept on hold: As clearly mentioned in the communication received, the return processing remains pending until the clarification is submitted.
  • Avoidance of incorrect adjustments: If no response is provided, the system may proceed to make prima facie adjustments based on available data.
  • Opportunity to explain discrepancies: The notice provides a fair opportunity to reconcile mismatches such as:
    • Income differences (Form 26AS/AIS vs ITR)
    • Deduction claims
    • Capital gains or other disclosures
  • Faster refund processing: In cases where refunds are due, timely response ensures quicker release.

Consequences of Not Responding on Time

Failure to respond within the prescribed time can lead to the following implications:

  • Return may be processed with adverse adjustments: Deductions or exemptions claimed may be disallowed.
  • Demand may be raised: Based on system-driven mismatch, tax demand may be generated.
  • Further scrutiny/notice: Non-response increases the likelihood of:
    • Detailed scrutiny notices
    • Verification proceedings
  • Loss of opportunity of being heard: The taxpayer loses the chance to justify genuine claims.

What Should You Do to Avoid Complications?

A structured approach is essential while dealing with such notices:

1. Carefully Review the Notice

  • Identify the exact discrepancy raised.
  • Cross-check with:
    • ITR filed
    • AIS / Form 26AS
    • Books of accounts / supporting documents

2. Prepare a Proper Reconciliation

  • Provide clear working/explanation for:
    • Income differences
    • Deduction claims
    • Exemptions or capital gains

3. Submit Response Online

  • Login to e-filing portal
  • Navigate to:
    • Pending Actions → e-Proceedings → Seek for Clarification
  • Submit response with proper attachments and e-verify.

4. Maintain Proper Documentation

Even if the explanation is straightforward, always keep ready:

  • Salary slips / Form 16
  • Bank statements
  • Capital gain workings
  • Investment proofs
  • Any other supporting evidence

This is important because even after clarification, there is a possibility of further verification notices.

If There is Any Incorrect Claim – File Updated Return

In cases where, upon review, the taxpayer identifies any error:

  • Do not ignore or justify incorrectly
  • Consider filing an Updated Return (u/s 139(8A)), if applicable to avoid any further penalty

This ensures Voluntary correction, Reduced litigation exposure and Lower penal consequences compared to departmental detection.

If the Claim is Correct – Be Prepared

Where the claim made in the return is accurate:

  • Submit a fact-based, concise response
  • Attach supporting documentary evidence
  • Keep all records ready for:
    • Possible verification
    • Future scrutiny

The department is increasingly using data-backed validation; hence, documentary substantiation is key.

Conclusion

The “Seek for Clarification” notices should not be viewed as a punitive action, but rather as a preventive compliance mechanism adopted by the Income-tax Department. The intent is clear—identify discrepancies at an early stage, ensure correct reporting, and avoid prolonged litigation in future.

At the same time, this shift places an increased responsibility on taxpayers to maintain proper documentation and be ready to substantiate their claims, even where such claims are genuine and already supported by records like Form 16 or other evidences. The key lies in being proactive, well-documented, and prompt in responding to such notices.

A balanced approach—where taxpayers ensure accuracy in filing and the Department ensures fair verification—will ultimately lead to a more efficient and less litigious tax environment.

In case you have received such a notice or require assistance in drafting an appropriate response, you can share your details at sharshil323@gmail.com.

Author Bio

I am CA Harshil Shah, Partner at P C Ghadiali and Co LLP, Mumbai, with over 9 years of professional experience in Direct Tax advisory, litigation support, and regulatory compliance. My core areas of practice include income tax litigation, tax planning and strategy, corporate tax advisory, and compli View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Why Outstanding Income Tax Demand Emails Are Reaching Taxpayers Now Consequences of Cancellation of Re‑Registration under Section 12AB – Why Charitable Trusts Cannot Afford to Ignore It Practical Guidance: Key Points to Keep in Mind While Replying to Notices under Section 12AB Refund Claim on Hold – New Risk Management Alert from Income Tax Department (AY 2025-26) Have you received an SMS or Email from Income Tax Department on Foreign Assets? Read This Carefully View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930