Case Law Details
Case Name : Mehta Emporium Jewellers Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Mehta Emporium Jewellers Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Conclusion: Reassessment order passed by AO without issuing notice under section 143(2) was invalid as it is mandatory obligation of AO to serve notice by assigning reasons therein with regard to his belief of escaped tax liability before making reassessment of any escaped income.
Held: In the instant case, AO had passed reassessment order under section 148 without issuing notice under section 143(2) to assesse
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.