Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mehta Emporium Jewellers Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mehta Emporium Jewellers Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Conclusion: Reassessment order passed by AO without issuing notice under section 143(2) was invalid as it is mandatory obligation of AO to serve notice by assigning reasons therein with regard to his belief of escaped tax liability before making reassessment of any escaped income. Held: In the instant case, AO had passed reassessment order under section 148 without issuing notice under section 143(2) to assessee. It was held notice under Section 143(2) was mandatory and in the absence of such service, AO could not proceed to make an inquiry on the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930