Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandip Sadanand Narkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sandip Sadanand Narkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai ITAT quashed the reassessment proceedings for AY 2015–16, holding that the notice issued u/s 148 after 01.04.2021 was time-barred under the amended Section 149, and hence the entire addition on alleged penny stock transactions was invalid. The AO had reopened the case based on penny stock information (Kabra Drugs Ltd.) and treated the entire sale proceeds of ₹49.47 lakh as unexplained u/s 68, alleging accommodation entries. The CIT(A) upheld both reopening and addition. However, the ITAT held: As per the Supreme Court ruling in Rajeev...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031