Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandip Sadanand Narkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sandip Sadanand Narkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai ITAT quashed the reassessment proceedings for AY 2015–16, holding that the notice issued u/s 148 after 01.04.2021 was time-barred under the amended Section 149, and hence the entire addition on alleged penny stock transactions was invalid. The AO had reopened the case based on penny stock information (Kabra Drugs Ltd.) and treated the entire sale proceeds of ₹49.47 lakh as unexplained u/s 68, alleging accommodation entries. The CIT(A) upheld both reopening and addition. However, the ITAT held: As per the Supreme Court ruling in Rajeev...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930