Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Consultating Engineering Services (India) Ltd. Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition (C) 2029 of 2014 & CM 4235 of 2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/09/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Brief of the Case

Delhi High Court held In the case of Consultating Engineering Services (India) Ltd. vs. DCIT that for reassessment as per first proviso of section 147, it is pre- condition that the assessee has not made a full and true disclosure of the material particulars necessary for the assessment. Accordingly, in the given case, the revenue cannot be permitted to reopen the assessment as the necessary pre-condition for doing so in a case which is beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year has not been fulfilled.

Facts of the Case

The assessment of the assessee was completed under section 143(3) on 15.12.2010.The assessing officer made certain additions on account of section 40(a)(ia) of Rs.1,55,94,534 under section 14A of Rs. Rs.1,55,603 and on account of extra depreciation claimed on computer peripherals Rs. 6,87,043.The notice under section 148 was issued on 21.03.2013, beyond four years from the end of the relevant Assessment Year. The reasons for the same given by the revenue were that the assessee had escaped the income and failed to disclose the true particulars of its income. The reasons of reopening of assessment were as follows:

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031