Purchases reflected in books can’t be treated as unexplained investment

Vimal Kishor Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Introduction: In the case of Vimal Kishor Shah vs ITO, ITAT Mumbai was faced with a pivotal issue regarding the treatment of certain purchases as unexplained investments. The appeals filed by the assessee were in response to orders passed by the learned CIT(A) for the A.Y. 2011-12 & 2014-15, wherein purchases of jewellery and shares were under scrutiny. This ruling represents an essential development in how financial transactions and investments are assessed under I

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.