This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Proviso to s. 2(15) does not apply to incidental services rendered without profit motive
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Himachal Pradesh Environment vs. CIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
The assessee, a statutory Board, was set up for prevention of pollution of streams and wells in the State and other allied activities. It derived income from various testing charges etc. The CIT granted registration u/s 12AA of the Act on the basis that the activities of the assessee constituted a “charitable purpose” u/s 2 (15) and that its’ income was eligible for exemption u/s 11. S. 2 (15) was amended by the FA 2008 w.e.f AY 2009-2010 to provide that the term ‘advancement of any object of general public utility’ would not constitute a “charitable purpose” if “it involves th...





