Provision of section 40A(3) doesn’t apply when payment for expenses are made by a person to an agent
Case Law Details
Case Name : Piprani Equipment P. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Ahmedabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Piprani Equipment P. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
ITAT Ahmedabad held that clause (k) of Rule 6DD specifies that where payment for expenses are made by a person to an agent who is required to make payment in cash on behalf of such person, then rigours of section 40A(3) are not applicable.
Facts-
A.O. observed that the assessee had made payment in cash exceeding the limit specified u/s 40(A)(3) of the Act on purchase of five old vehicles/JCB Machines on various dates
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.