Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Piprani Equipment P. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Piprani Equipment P. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

ITAT Ahmedabad held that clause (k) of Rule 6DD specifies that where payment for expenses are made by a person to an agent who is required to make payment in cash on behalf of such person, then rigours of section 40A(3) are not applicable.

Facts-

A.O. observed that the assessee had made payment in cash exceeding the limit specified u/s 40(A)(3) of the Act on purchase of five old vehicles/JCB Machines on various dates

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31