Case Law Details
Case Name : M/s. FL Smidth Minerals Pvt. Ltd Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Madras High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The assessee’s contention is that the provision made towards the non performance guarantee is more in the nature of warranty. Thus, the company assured quality and performance and on any shortfall agreed for damages making provision based on the performance capacity of the machineries supplied. Based on the materials available, on the assured capacity of the machinery and the quality of the product, the assessee had worked out the provision. Consequently, we do not find any ground to support the reasoning of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) which persuaded the Tribunal to reject ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

