This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Proceedings u/s 163 are only intended to ensure that a person can be regarded as a representative assessee only on existence of certain conditions
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Hindalco Industries Ltd. Vs. DCIT(IT) (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2001- 2002
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
DECIDED BY: ITAT, MUMBAI BENCH `L’, IN THE CASE OF: Hindalco Industries Ltd. Vs. DCIT(IT), APPEAL NO: ITA Nos. 3667 and 4684/Mum/2005, 6923/Mum/2006 , DECIDED ON May 14, 2010
ORDER
PER N. V. VASUDEVAN, JM:-
1. Therein after referred to as Hindalco}; while ITA No. 4968/Mum/2005 is an appeal by the revenue. Both these appeals are directed against the Hindalco Industries Limited order dated 31.3.2005 of learned CIT(A)-XXXI, Mumbai relating to A.Y. 2001-02 arising out of proceedings u/s. 147 of the Act read with section 163 of the Act.
2. ITA No. 3667/Mum/2005 is an appeal by Hindalco against ...
