Case Law Details
Case Name : Rajeev Behl Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Delhi High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rajeev Behl Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court)
Sub-section (1) of Section 179 cast burden upon the director to prove that the non-recovery cannot be attributed to any gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty on his part. The burden being on the director, the respondent ought to have established the requirements of the sub-section to escape the liability, and the respondent has failed to do so. The question as to whether the respondent discharged the burden is a pure question of fact and could not have been entertained in writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India when the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

