Madhu Anil Mark Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)
In the case of Madhu Anil Mark vs. ACIT, the assessee had filed an appeal against the order of the ADDL/JCIT(A), Lucknow, dated August 22, 2024, concerning an assessment order under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for AY 2017-18. However, due to a technical error, the assessee inadvertently filed an appeal before ITAT, Lucknow, on the same subject matter. Realizing the mistake, the assessee’s Authorized Representative (AR) submitted a letter on December 26, 2024, requesting permission to withdraw the duplicate appeal. The AR clarified that since the matter had already been disposed of by ADDL/JCIT(A), continuing with the current appeal was unnecessary.
During the hearing, the Senior Departmental Representative (DR), Smt. Tarannum Verma, did not object to the withdrawal request. Taking into account the circumstances, ITAT Raipur allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The Tribunal formally dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The order was pronounced in an open court on January 23, 2025.
FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT RAIPUR
The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the ADDL/JCIT(A), Lucknow, dated 22.08.2024, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O under Sec.144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 17.12.2019 for the assessment year 2017-18.
