Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandeep Kaur Gill Vs JCIT (ITAT Raipur)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 63/RPR/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/04/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sandeep Kaur Gill Vs JCIT (ITAT Raipur)

ITAT Raipur held that assessee failed to put forth the reasonable cause because of which provisions of section 269T of the Income Tax Act was not complied. Accordingly, penalty under section 271E of the Income Tax Act leviable.

Facts- The assessee had made cash repayment of loans that were raised by her from M/s. Tata Motors and M/s. Tata Finance Ltd for financing purchase of buses. On the basis of the information shared by the AO with the JCIT, Range-3, Raipur, the latter called upon the assessee to show cause as to why penalty may not be imposed upon her u/s. 271E of the Act for having repaid the loans in question otherwise than as per the modes prescribed in section 269T of the Act.

JCIT held that the assessee had without any reasonable cause repaid the loans in contravention of the provisions section 269T of the Act, therein saddled her with a penalty of Rs.6,71,939/- u/s. 271E of the Act.

On appeal, the CIT(A) finding no substance in the contentions of the assessee dismissed the appeal.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031