Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Macrotech Developers Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No.2581/Mum/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/06/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs Macrotech Developers Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)

Held that there was bonafide belief of the assessee that passing journal entries, even though in violation of mode prescribed u/s. 269SS and section 269T, is permissible. Entries done before judgement of Hon’ble Bombay HC in the case of Triumph International. Penalty deleted on the basis of reasonable cause.

Facts-

The assessee is engaged in the business of development and construction of Real Estate Properties. The assessee filed its ROI declaring a total income of Rs.4,950/- under the normal provisions of the Act and book profit of Rs.11,31,373/- u/s 115JB.

AO noted that the assessee had accepted/repaid loans from various sister concerns through journal entries other than by the account payee cheque/draft. Therefore, AO issued notice to the assessee as to why penalty u/s 271D/271E should not be levied for violation of section 269SS/269T.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031