Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subhash Chand Saini Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Subhash Chand Saini Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) ITAT Jaipur held that penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act not leviable as the assessee is eligible to avail the benefit of presumptive taxation up to Rs. 2 Crores as per section 44D of the Income Tax Act. Facts- Assessee is engaged in the business of wholesale trading of vegetables during the year under consideration. AO on completion of assessment proceedings-initiated issued notice for penalty proceedings u/s 271 B for failure to file audit report as per provision of section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, as the turn over as declared in the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930