Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prafulla Shashikant Vaidya Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Prafulla Shashikant Vaidya Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that the levy of penalty under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act is not mandatory or automatic and same needs to be examined depending upon the facts and circumstances of the case. Facts- There was search action on the ‘Valuable Group’ and a consequential search was carried out at the premises of the assessee. During the course of search, jewellery of Rs. 2,14,53,102/- was found and Rs.1,55,54,889/- and cash of Rs. 29.08 lakhs were found, out of which Rs. 27 Lakh was seized. During the course of assessment, the assessee s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031