Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prafulla Shashikant Vaidya Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Prafulla Shashikant Vaidya Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that the levy of penalty under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act is not mandatory or automatic and same needs to be examined depending upon the facts and circumstances of the case.

Facts- There was search action on the ‘Valuable Group’ and a consequential search was carried out at the premises of the assessee. During the course of search, jewellery of Rs. 2,14,53,102/- was found and Rs.1,55,54,889/- a

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31