Case Law Details
Headmaster Saloon Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
ITAT Chandigarh held that claiming of wrong depreciation on the advice of auditor is bona fide claim and hence penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not leviable.
Facts- AO, by virtue of the assessment order, made addition of Rs. 15,31,989/- on account of wrong claim of depreciation and that of Rs. 2,09,559/-, on account of claim of depreciation on purchase of machinery of Rs. 27,94,120/-. The assessee did not prefer any appeal against the said order.
In the penalty proceedings, the assessee was asked to show cause as to why penalty be not imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act, for furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. AO imposed penalty of Rs. 6,00,000/- being 111.5% of the tax sought to be evaded. CIT(A) upheld the same.
Conclusion- In ‘Pawan Garg Vs. ACIT’, the assessee had wrongly claimed long-term capital loss in respect of a property which had been gifted by him to his son. Since the amount of capital loss had been duly disclosed in the computation of income and the assessee had also accepted at the time of assessment proceedings, that by mistake, he had considered the gift made to his son as a transfer, the assessee was held not to have concealed any material fact, and levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act was held not justified. In the case at hand, similarly, the assessee had claimed depreciation on the advice of its auditors. This was a bona fide claim, may be a wrong claim. Otherwise too, the assessee earning profits year to year, reduction of depreciation in one year would have had the impact of higher depreciation in the subsequent year.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
