Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty u/s. 270A quashed as specific limb u/s. 270A(9) not specified

Case Law Details

Case Name
Hi-Tech Engineers Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Advertisement Hi-Tech Engineers Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that levy of penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act cannot be sustained since specific limb of Section 270A(9) leading to under-reporting of income or mis-reporting of income is not specified. Accordingly, appeal of assessee is allowed. Facts- The Assessee, a partnership firm, under Section 153A of the Act vide Assessment Order, dated 30/09/2021, whereby addition of INR.70,93,473/- was made in the hands of the Assessee under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act. CIT(A) restricted the addition on account of the al...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *