Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anshu Priyadarshini Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Anshu Priyadarshini Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

When Assessment Falls, Penalty Can’t Stand: ITAT Delhi Quashes 271(1)(c) Penalty After De-novo Remand

The Delhi ITAT “SMC” Bench, comprising Shri Vikas Awasthy (Judicial Member), allowed the appeal of Anshu Priyadarshini for AY 2011-12 and set aside the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c), holding that the penalty proceedin

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Rejection of Motion in One House Does Not Stall Judge Inquiry CPC Cannot Treat Form 3CD Entries as Final Without Verification Wrong Valuation Report Leads to Capital Gains Addition Partners’ Remuneration Disallowance Set Aside Due to ITR Error Delay Excused Where Notices Never Reached the Assessee View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031