Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anshu Priyadarshini Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anshu Priyadarshini Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) When Assessment Falls, Penalty Can’t Stand: ITAT Delhi Quashes 271(1)(c) Penalty After De-novo Remand The Delhi ITAT “SMC” Bench, comprising Shri Vikas Awasthy (Judicial Member), allowed the appeal of Anshu Priyadarshini for AY 2011-12 and set aside the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c), holding that the penalty proceedings could not survive once the underlying assessment was restored for de-novo adjudication The penalty had been levied on additions made in the assessment order dated 15.12.2018 passed u/s 144/147. However, the Tribunal had earlier, in t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930