Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs M/s Jain Export Private Ltd (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA-194/2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/03/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief of the case

Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. M/s Jain Export Private Ltd.  held that, to initiate proceedings under Section 271(1)(c), it requires proper investigation and higher satisfaction of proof, which confirmed the basis for the initiation of necessary proceedings. In the absence of it the penalty provision can’t be invoked.

Facts of the Case

The assessee for sale of shares have acquired such shares which was duly reported and accepted by the AO concerned. The Company of which the shares were bought was eventually directed to be wound up and was in the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), for the purposes of rehabilitation. Ultimately, those efforts failed. In the quantum proceedings, the assessee’s contentions were rejected and the amount of ₹44,20,250/-, which was claimed as loss was disallowed.

Contention of the Revenue

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031