Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) without specifying exact limb is bad-in-law

Case Law Details

Case Name
Manisha Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2014-15
Advertisement Manisha Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi held that notice issued initiating the penalty proceeding without specifying the limb of section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is bad-in-law and liable to be quashed. Facts- The present appeal is filed by the assessee against order of CIT(A) sustaining the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Assessee mainly contested that the penalty order is bad in law as the penalty proceedings were initiated and penalty was levied without specifying the exact limb of Section 271 (1 )(c) of the Act. Conclusion- Hon’ble...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *