Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandu Laxman Chavan Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Chandu Laxman Chavan Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)

While levying penalty, the Assessing Officer invoked only the charge of “furnishing inaccurate particulars of income”. It is evident that while recording satisfaction the Assessing Officer was not clear in his mind as to which charge u/s. 271(1) (c) is to be invoked for initiating penalty. The ambiguity in the mind of Assessing Officer with regard to charge u/s. 271(1)(c) for levy of penalty is evident writ large.

7. Ginning Factory reported as 359 ITR 565 has held the “assessee should know th

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31